A blog about financial planning by Andrew Jennings. Andrew has worked in insurance since 2003; you'll find information on insurance for individuals and businesses, such as life and critical illness insurance, trusts, business protection (key person insurance, shareholder protection, liability insurance) amongst other things
Showing posts with label business protection. Show all posts
Showing posts with label business protection. Show all posts
Tuesday, 27 October 2015
What happens at a business protection review?
Labels:
business protection,
financial advice,
key person insurance,
liability insurance,
life insurance,
relevant life insurance,
shareholder protection
St Ives, Cambridgshire, UK
Saint Ives, Cambridgeshire PE27 5BH, UK
Thursday, 14 August 2014
Protect the future of your business
Labels:
business protection,
critical illness,
financial advice,
financial advisor,
Infographic,
key person insurance,
liability insurance,
life insurance,
shareholder protection
St Ives, Cambridgshire, UK
Cambridgeshire PE27, UK
Saturday, 20 July 2013
How Well Protected Is Your Business?
To
safeguard your business you have probably secured buildings
insurance, machinery or equipment insurance and indemnity or public
liability insurance. You may have covered the tangible assets of your
business, but have you protected the most important assets: the
people that directly contribute to your profits? Are your profits
protected should you lose employees unexpectedly? How will your
business profits be protected if you or your business partner is
taken ill and can’t work?
If you run
your own business, you probably have one or more key employees that
are integral to its success. These are the people who possess the
skills, knowledge, experience or leadership that makes a vital
difference to your bottom line.
Does your
business have a Sales Manager with an established network of contacts
perhaps? Do you have highly skilled or technical staff? What about
you, the director or business owner? Have you
considered what would happen if they suddenly died, or suffered a
critical illness that forced them to be absent from work for a long
period of time? Have you considered the costs and time
implications associated with recruiting a locum or temporary
contractor to fill the gap? What effect will their absence have on
your business’s profits?
If the
unexpected happened before you've had a chance to protect against
such loss, your business would be at risk of collapse.
Q.
What is Key Person Insurance?
Key Person
Insurance is a simple way for businesses making a profit to insure
their business against the losses they might suffer as a result of
the death, disability or critical illness of a key individual.
Q.
My business is very small with fewer than ten staff. Do I need to be
concerned with Key Person Insurance?
Absolutely.
With a small business key people are more likely to be
responsible for a larger proportion of the company’s profits. If
the unexpected were to happen, then the impact for a small business
would be dramatic and could have huge consequences financially.
Q.
My business is larger with more Key People. What should I do?
Large
businesses should also consider Key Person Insurance. FTSE100
companies all insure their key people as part of their business
continuity plan. Even though the impact of one person no longer
coming to work wouldn’t be as financially disastrous for a very
large firm, they still consider it vital to protect their profits.
Q.
Is there any other cover I should be aware of to protect my
business?
Yes. As
part of your business continuity planning you should consider
shareholder protection and loan protection. These provide the
business with cash to buy the shares of a deceased or seriously ill
director, or repay a loan should the bank, for example, recall this
on the death of a director. Whether you are a sole trader,
partnership or a Limited Company, you must ensure that your business
has the correct financial safeguards in place.
_________________________________________________________
With
over 25 years of experience in helping people make their financial
plans, Ewing Associates build strong trusted relationships with our
clients. We offer an expert and friendly financial planning service.
Our
experience covers personal and corporate financial advice. We fully
understand the individual needs of every client and provide a first
class service.
We
will help you understand the numerous financial services available,
tailor the right solution to your specific needs and help make your
money work harder for YOU.
Ewing
Associates’ services include mortgage advice, personal and
corporate financial planning, investment advice and estate planning.
E-mail
andrew@ewingassociates.co.uk or call 01480 357100 for more
information
Labels:
business protection,
critical illness,
Ewing Associates,
FCA,
financial advice,
financial advisor,
FSA,
keyperson insurance,
life insurance,
protection
St Ives, Cambridgshire, UK
Saint Ives, Cambridgeshire PE27 5BH, UK
Tuesday, 11 September 2012
As a company director, is your life insurance as tax efficient as it could be?
Relevant life policies are a type of life insurance for employers to provide employees with death benefits.
They can be very useful when there aren’t enough employees to justify a group scheme or, where an individual requires a greater level of benefit than the group scheme provides. As directors working day to day in a business are likely to qualify as employees, this can be a more tax efficient way for a company director to provide life assurance benefits for his/her dependants rather than paying for it personally or it being treated as a benefit in kind.
They can be very useful when there aren’t enough employees to justify a group scheme or, where an individual requires a greater level of benefit than the group scheme provides. As directors working day to day in a business are likely to qualify as employees, this can be a more tax efficient way for a company director to provide life assurance benefits for his/her dependants rather than paying for it personally or it being treated as a benefit in kind.
An example of relevant life insurance and its tax efficiency:
Mrs Anne Other is a shareholding director of A.Other Ltd, an engineering business, and currently has life insurance in place. She wishes to review her insurance as she and her partner are expecting their third child and they would like more cover.
Comparing the two plans that her financial adviser recommends, Anne doesn't hesitate to choose the Relevant Life plan. Below you can see the sums that made her decision easy.
The Relevant Life Plan is particularly beneficial for Anne because she’s the director and shareholder of her own business, so all the savings go to her. If she were to pay for her life cover personally it would cost her £1,569.65 every year. By buying her cover through the company using a Relevant Life Plan, it only costs £800 each year. That’s £769.65 less, which is a saving of almost 50%.
(This is a fictitious example, and also assumes that the Relevant Life plan qualifies as an allowable business expense, which it usually is)
What makes this plan so good for company directors?
- You can effectively make a big saving on life cover compared with paying for it personally.
- Premiums are normally classed as a business expense and so are likely to be an allowable deduction for Corporation Tax purposes.
- Premiums and benefits do not count towards your annual or lifetime allowance – particularly important if you have a large pension fund or wish to maximise your contributions into your pension.
- Keeping the plan in trust offers the potential to plan for Inheritance Tax if your estate is or is likely to be worth more than the current Inheritance Tax threshold.
- Offers a cost-effective way to provide Death In Service benefits to your employees.
Any limitations or drawbacks?
Relevant Life Plans are not available for sole traders, equity partners of a partnership or equity members of a Limited Liability Partnership.
It’s a Single Life Policy, which means each plan covers one person – you, for example.
There’s no option to include joint cover, such as for you and your partner, in the same policy.
There’s no option to include joint cover, such as for you and your partner, in the same policy.
How do I take advantage of a Relevant Life plan?
Speak to your financial adviser who should be able to discuss the features in more detail.
Labels:
business protection,
Ewing Associates,
financial advice,
financial advisor,
inheritance tax,
life insurance,
protection,
relevant life,
trust
St Ives, Cambridgshire, UK
St Ives, Cambridgeshire PE27 5BH, UK
Wednesday, 5 September 2012
The financial regulator wants a change to the way financial products are sold. A reaction to Martin Wheatley's speech.
In a speech published today, the Managing Director of the FSA, Martin Wheatley says he intends to change the culture of how consumers are viewed and sold to by some financial organisations.
This follows the recent PPI and loan mis-selling scandals, as well as other ativities which have tarnished the public's view of the financial services industry, such as Libor abuse and the mis-selling of interest rate products to small businesses.
Mr Wheatley goes on to say:
Although Mr Wheatley's focus appears to be on the non-advised arena that consumers will most likely encounter on the web and along the high street, the ideas he presents are high-level and therefore rather general. At this stage it's difficult to ascertain whether protection products such as life insurance, critical illness, and income protection will ultimately be affected by these plans. If they are, then it's important to get the balance right between protecting consumers from unscrupulous salespeople and not hindering, but rather improving accessibility to and awareness of good financial advice.
If advisers were no longer allowed to be remunerated by providers of protection products this would inevitably lead to a fee-based system similar to that for investment advice following changes brought about by the Retail Distribution Review (RDR). The problem with this approach for protection, is that few consumers actively seek protection advice. I suspect even fewer would be willing to pay a fee for it, especially if protection and life insurance can still be bought on a non-advised basis direct from providers over the internet, for example.
If we did reach such a situation it would likely lead to more consumers buying cover which may not be best suited to their needs (e.g. paying more for level term when only decreasing mortgage protection is required; creating a potential inheritance tax issue; not correctly assessing what sums insured are needed for family protection; not writing policies in trust and thereby failing to avoid probate delays). Or, worse still, we could see more people not taking out any cover at all and leaving their families unprotected because of a public perception that advice is too costly.
What I think is key to improving the service which consumers receive, is that non-advised selling of protection products should cease. This would ensure that all protection customers have received advice on what is right for their present circumstances. Every policy written should have evidence of its suitability for each particular client, including less/more expensive alternatives that were available yet not appropriate, features which were included/excluded and why they were/weren't right for the client.
This would result in the best of both worlds for consumers: no fee means a similar proportion as at present would still perceive financial protection as an accessible and affordable avenue to explore; and offering protection on an advised-only basis minimises the opportunity for mis-selling (due to current methods of quality monitoring) as well as providing all the added benefits of the advice process.
Let's hope, for the sake of consumers and their families, the FCA see things from a similar perspective.
But what is also still clear is that we need financial services more than ever. Most of us need to save more for our retirements, but many are not doing enough. And all of us need a strong, profitable financial services industry that can give us the advice we need to guide us, that can help to protect us from the unforeseen, and that can deliver the products that will help us achieve our life goals.I completely agree with this; it not only explains why the industry needs to be ethical, but also any business which correctly identifies and plugs such gaps in people's lives will be contributing to their own long-term success by doing so. But what does concern me is how the FSA or the FCA might further restrict the ways in which good quality, relationship-based financial advisers can operate, potentially resulting in fewer people receiving important financial advice.
Although Mr Wheatley's focus appears to be on the non-advised arena that consumers will most likely encounter on the web and along the high street, the ideas he presents are high-level and therefore rather general. At this stage it's difficult to ascertain whether protection products such as life insurance, critical illness, and income protection will ultimately be affected by these plans. If they are, then it's important to get the balance right between protecting consumers from unscrupulous salespeople and not hindering, but rather improving accessibility to and awareness of good financial advice.
Pricing Customers Out
If advisers were no longer allowed to be remunerated by providers of protection products this would inevitably lead to a fee-based system similar to that for investment advice following changes brought about by the Retail Distribution Review (RDR). The problem with this approach for protection, is that few consumers actively seek protection advice. I suspect even fewer would be willing to pay a fee for it, especially if protection and life insurance can still be bought on a non-advised basis direct from providers over the internet, for example.
If we did reach such a situation it would likely lead to more consumers buying cover which may not be best suited to their needs (e.g. paying more for level term when only decreasing mortgage protection is required; creating a potential inheritance tax issue; not correctly assessing what sums insured are needed for family protection; not writing policies in trust and thereby failing to avoid probate delays). Or, worse still, we could see more people not taking out any cover at all and leaving their families unprotected because of a public perception that advice is too costly.
The Best of Both Worlds
To ensure protection customers continue to receive the best outcome, I believe that insurance providers should continue to pay advisers for finding their clients. This way, advice and recommendations can still be offered with no fee required from the customer. Upfront fees would no doubt alienate a large proportion of the public who might otherwise have benefited from protection.What I think is key to improving the service which consumers receive, is that non-advised selling of protection products should cease. This would ensure that all protection customers have received advice on what is right for their present circumstances. Every policy written should have evidence of its suitability for each particular client, including less/more expensive alternatives that were available yet not appropriate, features which were included/excluded and why they were/weren't right for the client.
This would result in the best of both worlds for consumers: no fee means a similar proportion as at present would still perceive financial protection as an accessible and affordable avenue to explore; and offering protection on an advised-only basis minimises the opportunity for mis-selling (due to current methods of quality monitoring) as well as providing all the added benefits of the advice process.
Let's hope, for the sake of consumers and their families, the FCA see things from a similar perspective.
Labels:
business protection,
commission,
critical illness,
Ewing Associates,
FCA,
financial advice,
financial advisor,
FSA,
incentives,
inheritance tax,
keyperson insurance,
life insurance,
Martin Wheatley,
regulator
St Ives, Cambridgshire, UK
St Ives, Cambridgeshire PE27 5BH, UK
Saturday, 25 August 2012
Losing sight of everyday threats could put your business at risk
If you are a business owner or a director, you are no doubt working harder than ever to
steer the company through this difficult trading period. As result,
your thoughts may be more focussed on the short-term needs of the company more than usual.
But
it’s more important now that you don’t lose sight of the
ongoing threats to your business – threats that could have an
impact as severe as any market downturn.
Protecting your most important assets
If
a director, co-owner or key individual within your business were to
die, or become critically ill, it could have a serious impact on your
company’s ability to trade. For instance:
- How would the loss of their expertise and experience impact the business?
- If they are a shareholder, what would happen to their shares? Could the business afford to buy them back?
- How would your debtors and creditors react? Would loans be called in?
You
probably already protect your company’s material assets, like
premises, vehicles and equipment. Surely it makes sense to also
protect the company’s most important assets – its people.
How you can obtain help
Some financial advisers often work with businesses offering advice on how best to
protect them from the financial impact of unforeseen events.
There is a range of products that can give you peace of mind
when it comes to the long-term stability of your business.
If it has been several years since, or if you have never conducted a review of your business's protection requirements, it would be a good idea to find a financial adviser who specialises in this area for an appointment. Don't leave your business unprotected until it is too late.
Labels:
business protection,
Ewing Associates,
financial advisor,
keyperson insurance,
life insurance,
protection,
shareholder protection
St Ives, Cambridgshire, UK
9 Station Rd, Saint Ives, Cambridgeshire PE27, UK
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


